Post by Economic layoffs In today's ba on Feb 25, 2024 1:15:39 GMT -5
So, what are the reasons and thinking behind the layoffs? Let’s take a look at the author’s analysis. A friend whom I hadn't seen for a long time suddenly contacted me and after a few words, I found out that the executive had been "layoff". After chatting for a while, I found that there was quite a lot in this layoff story. Regarding layoffs, the company has three definitions: environment, if a company is not developing smoothly and its performance is shrinking and it is facing economic difficulties,
one of the ways to mitigate it is to reduce the company's economic costs through layoffs and reduce the size of the company to save expenses. This situation may account for more than % of the entire layoff range. There will Colombia Phone Number List be a problem here: most of the layoffs are first to lay off mid-level and lower-level employees, and then to high-level employees. So why kill the middle and lower levels first? After all, in the understanding of many people, the middle and lower levels are the ones who actually do the work and can solve problems.
Just like the recent news circulating on the Internet, "Tencent and Alibaba Didi collapsed one after another, just because they laid off front-line employees." In fact, this kind of BUG occurs because of "coincidence" and is not caused by laying off low-level employees. Here is something to consider: In the eyes of many companies: middle- and lower-level employees are easy to recruit, and the problem can be solved by starting over and taking over individually. Most of the top executives have mutual interests with the top leaders , which leaves them with a way to mitigate.
one of the ways to mitigate it is to reduce the company's economic costs through layoffs and reduce the size of the company to save expenses. This situation may account for more than % of the entire layoff range. There will Colombia Phone Number List be a problem here: most of the layoffs are first to lay off mid-level and lower-level employees, and then to high-level employees. So why kill the middle and lower levels first? After all, in the understanding of many people, the middle and lower levels are the ones who actually do the work and can solve problems.
Just like the recent news circulating on the Internet, "Tencent and Alibaba Didi collapsed one after another, just because they laid off front-line employees." In fact, this kind of BUG occurs because of "coincidence" and is not caused by laying off low-level employees. Here is something to consider: In the eyes of many companies: middle- and lower-level employees are easy to recruit, and the problem can be solved by starting over and taking over individually. Most of the top executives have mutual interests with the top leaders , which leaves them with a way to mitigate.